Evidence-first findings
Each important conclusion references typed evidence IDs that resolve to document sections and exact source passages.
VANTREXIS Labs concept
AI analysis that never loses its connection to evidence. PRISM explores an evidence-first approach to document intelligence, connecting findings to entities, relationships, and exact source passages so users can move from an AI-generated conclusion back to the documents that support it—while humans remain responsible for the final decision.
What the concept explores
PRISM explores an AI workflow where every important conclusion remains connected to the document, section, and exact cited passage behind it—while a human reviewer controls the final decision.
Each important conclusion references typed evidence IDs that resolve to document sections and exact source passages.
Findings highlight the companies, agreements, people, assets, and financial relationships they concern.
Accept, request clarification, dismiss, and note actions update a local audit trail without suggesting autonomous judgment.
System model
The demo runs entirely in the browser with typed, deterministic mock data. Each state transition is derived from relationships in the product model.
Open a diligence finding
Inspect the AI interpretation
Trace linked evidence
Read the exact source
Record a human decision
Engineering challenges
The concept focuses on relationship modelling, consequential interaction, and operational clarity—not fabricated business outcomes.
Engineering focus
PRISM explores the systems behind evidence-first intelligence: connecting machine-generated findings to document structure, business relationships and exact source passages while preserving a clear path for human review and accountable decision-making.
Represent findings, clauses, agreements, entities and exact source references as an explicit evidence model so conclusions remain connected to the relationships that support them.
Findings · Clauses · Entities · Source references
Design analysis flows where an AI-generated finding can be traced through its supporting reasoning context instead of being presented as an isolated answer.
Traceability · Evidence context · Explainable conclusions
Keep the selected finding, evidence reference, document, page, section and highlighted source passage synchronized as the user moves through the investigation.
Finding state · Evidence references · Source context
Structure large document collections so findings can retain meaningful connections to document categories, clauses, entities and review context across a due-diligence workspace.
Document structure · Retrieval context · Data-room workflows
Separate machine-generated analysis from human decisions through explicit review states, reviewer actions and evidence-preserving workflows.
Review states · Decision controls · Human ownership
Preserve how a finding moved from generated analysis through review, notes and final disposition without disconnecting that history from the supporting evidence.
Audit history · Review state · Decision provenance
Evidence model
Interactive product concept
No account or external service is required. The demo is static-hostable and resets to a coherent first-run state.
Trace a findingHave a similar challenge?